NovaCopper Files NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Bornite Project, Alaska
May 16, 2016
NovaCopper Files NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Bornite Project, Alaska
May 16, 2016 - Vancouver, British Columbia - NovaCopper Inc. (TSX, NYSE-MKT: NCQ) ("NovaCopper" or "the Company") is pleased to announce that it has filed a National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101") compliant technical report (the "Report") titled "NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Bornite Project, Northwest Alaska, USA." The effective date of this report is May 16, 2016. The report was compiled by Mr. Bruce Davis, FAusIMM, the president of BD Resource Consulting Inc., Mr. Robert Sim P.Geo., of Sim Geological Inc., and Mr. Jeff Austin, P.Eng., of International Metallurgical and Environmental Inc. and describes the potential in-pit and below-pit resources previously announced by the Company on April 19, 2016. The Report has been filed on SEDAR and EDGAR and is also available on the Company's website at www.novacopper.com.
The Bornite Project is located in the highly prospective Ambler mining district of northwestern Alaska. Highlights of the technical report are as follows:
Highlights:
- At a base case 0.50% copper cutoff grade, the Bornite Project is estimated to contain in-pit Indicated Resources of 40.5 million tonnes at 1.02% copper for 913 million pounds of contained copper (see Table 1 for details).
- At a base case 0.50% copper cutoff grade, the Bornite Project is estimated to contain in-pit Inferred Resources of 84.1 million tonnes at 0.95% copper for 1.8 billion pounds of contained copper (see Table 1 for details).
- At a base case 1.50% copper cutoff grade, the Bornite Project is estimated to contain below-pit Inferred Resources of 57.8 million tonnes at 2.89% copper for 3.7 billion pounds of contained copper (see Table 2 for details).
- Contained copper in Indicated Resources has increased from 334 to 913 million pounds which constitutes a 173% increase in contained copper metal (see Figure 1 for details).
- Total contained copper in Inferred Resources has decreased from 5,696 to 5,450 million pounds (1,768Mlbs in-pit and 3,683Mlbs below-pit) which constitutes a 4% decrease in contained metal (see Figure 1 for details). The reduction in contained copper is due principally to moving in-pit Inferred resources to the Indicated category.
Figure 1: Growth in Contained Copper at the Bornite Project
Table 1: Bornite Deposit - In-Pit Mineral Resource Estimate
Indicated | Inferred | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cutoff % Cu | Tonnes (millions) | Grade % Cu | Contained Cu (lbs, millions) | Tonnes (millions) | Grade % Cu | Contained Cu (lbs, millions) |
0.35 | 48.2 | 0.93 | 987 | 100.4 | 0.87 | 1,918 |
0.40 | 46.4 | 0.95 | 972 | 95.6 | 0.89 | 1,880 |
0.45 | 43.8 | 0.98 | 947 | 89.9 | 0.92 | 1,828 |
0.50 | 40.5 | 1.02 | 913 | 84.1 | 0.95 | 1,768 |
0.55 | 37.3 | 1.07 | 877 | 77.9 | 0.99 | 1,696 |
0.60 | 34.1 | 1.11 | 837 | 71.8 | 1.02 | 1,618 |
- Base Case cutoff grade of 0.50% Cu is highlighted in table.
- Resources stated as contained within a pit shell developed using a metal price of US$3.00/lb Cu, mining costs of US$2.00/tonne, milling costs of US$11/tonne, G&A cost of US$5.00/tonne, 87% metallurgical recoveries and an average pit slope of 43 degrees.
- Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resources will be converted into Mineral Reserves. See "Cautionary Note to United States Investors."
- Inferred resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and whether they can be mined legally or economically. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of the Inferred resources will ever be upgraded to a higher category.
Table 2: Bornite Deposit -- Below-Pit Mineral Resource Estimate
Inferred | |||
---|---|---|---|
Cutoff % Cu | Tonnes (millions) | Grade % Cu | Contained Cu (lbs, millions) |
0.5 | 238.1 | 1.35 | 7,081 |
1.0 | 107.0 | 2.11 | 4,990 |
1.5 | 57.8 | 2.89 | 3,683 |
2.0 | 39.4 | 3.45 | 2,993 |
2.5 | 29.1 | 3.88 | 2,448 |
3.0 | 22.6 | 4.21 | 2,094 |
- Base Case cutoff grade of 1.5% Cu is highlighted in table.
- Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resources will be converted into Mineral Reserves. See "Cautionary Note to United States Investors."
- Inferred resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and whether they can be mined legally or economically. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of the Inferred resources will ever be upgraded to a higher category.
The Company is not aware of any environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, social-political, marketing or other issue which may materially affect this estimate of mineral resources. The estimates presented in the Report constitute forward-looking statements and readers are urged not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statement. Additional cautionary and forward-looking statement information is detailed at the end of this press release.
Qualified Persons
Erin Workman, P.Geo., Director of Technical Services for NovaCopper
Inc., is a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101. Ms. Workman has
reviewed the technical information in this news release and approves the
disclosure contained herein. Bruce Davis, FAusIMM, of BD Resource
Consulting Inc., Robert Sim, P.Geo., of Sim Geological Inc., and Jeff
Austin, P.Eng., of International Metallurgical and Environmental Inc.,
and each a qualified person as defined by NI 43-101 have also reviewed
the technical information in this news release and approve the
disclosure contained herein.
Neither Bruce Davis of BD Resource Consulting Inc., Robert Sim of Sim
Geological Inc., nor Jeff Austin of International Metallurgical &
Environmental Inc., nor any associates employed in the preparation of
the Bornite Project resource estimation have any beneficial interest in
NovaCopper. These Consultants are not insiders, associates, or
affiliates of NovaCopper. The information in this press release is not
dependent upon any prior agreements concerning the conclusions to be
reached, nor are there any undisclosed understandings concerning any
future business dealings between NovaCopper and the Consultants. The
Consultants were retained by NovaCopper to prepare the Bornite Project
resource estimate and are to be paid a fee for their work in accordance
with normal professional consulting practices.
About NovaCopper
NovaCopper Inc. is a metals exploration company focused on exploring and
developing the Ambler mining district located in northwestern Alaska.
It is one of the richest and most-prospective known copper-dominant
districts located in one of the safest geopolitical jurisdictions in the
world. It hosts world-class polymetallic VMS deposits that contain
copper, zinc, lead, gold and silver, and carbonate replacement deposits
which have been found to host high-grade copper mineralization.
Exploration efforts have been focused on two deposits in the Ambler
district -- the Arctic VMS deposit and the Bornite carbonate replacement
deposit. Both deposits are located within NovaCopper's land package
that spans approximately 143,000 hectares. NovaCopper has an agreement
with NANA Regional Corporation, Inc., a Regional Alaska Native
Corporation that provides a framework for the exploration and potential
development of the Ambler mining district in cooperation with local
communities. Our vision is to develop the Ambler mining district into a
premier North American copper producer. The Company also owns 100% of
the Titiribi Project located approximately 70 kilometers southwest of
the city of Medellin, Colombia, in Antioquia department, within
historical Titiribi mining district.
More information on the Company, its properties and its management team is available on the Company's website at www.novacopper.com.
NovaCopper Contact:
Rick Van Nieuwenhuyse
President & Chief Executive Officer
Elaine Sanders
Chief Financial Officer
604-638-8088 or 1-855-638-8088
# # #
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This press release includes certain "forward-looking
information" and "forward-looking statements" (collectively
"forward-looking statements") within the meaning of applicable Canadian
and United States securities legislation including the United States
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other
than statements of historical fact, included herein, without limitation,
statements relating to the future operating or financial performance of
NovaCopper, planned expenditures and the anticipated activity at the
UKMP Projects, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements are frequently, but not always, identified by words such as
"expects", "anticipates", "believes", "intends", "estimates",
"potential", "possible", and similar expressions, or statements that
events, conditions, or results "will", "may", "could", or "should" occur
or be achieved. These forward-looking statements may include statements
regarding perceived merit of properties; exploration plans and budgets;
mineral reserves and resource estimates; work programs; capital
expenditures; timelines; strategic plans; market prices for precious and
base metals; or other statements that are not statements of fact.
Forward-looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties.
There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be
accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially
from those anticipated in such statements. Important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from NovaCopper's expectations
include the uncertainties involving the need for additional financing
to explore and develop properties and availability of financing in the
debt and capital markets; uncertainties involved in the interpretation
of drilling results and geological tests and the estimation of reserves
and resources; the need for cooperation of government agencies and
native groups in the development and operation of properties; the need
to obtain permits and governmental approvals; risks of construction and
mining projects such as accidents, equipment breakdowns, bad weather,
non-compliance with environmental and permit requirements, unanticipated
variation in geological structures, metal grades or recovery rates;
unexpected cost increases, which could include significant increases in
estimated capital and operating costs; fluctuations in metal prices and
currency exchange rates; and other risks and uncertainties disclosed in
NovaCopper's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30,
2015 filed with Canadian securities regulatory authorities and with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission and in other NovaCopper
reports and documents filed with applicable securities regulatory
authorities from time to time. NovaCopper's forward-looking statements
reflect the beliefs, opinions and projections on the date the statements
are made. NovaCopper assumes no obligation to update the
forward-looking statements or beliefs, opinions, projections, or other
factors, should they change, except as required by law.
Cautionary Note to United States Investors
This press release has been prepared in accordance with the
requirements of the securities laws in effect in Canada, which differ
from the requirements of U.S. securities laws. Unless otherwise
indicated, all resource and reserve estimates included in this press
release have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101") and the
Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum Definition
Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. NI 43-101 is a rule
developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators which establishes
standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and
technical information concerning mineral projects. Canadian standards,
including NI 43-101, differ significantly from the requirements of the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), and resource
and reserve information contained herein may not be comparable to
similar information disclosed by U.S. companies. In particular, and
without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the term "resource"
does not equate to the term "reserves". Under U.S. standards,
mineralization may not be classified as a "reserve" unless the
determination has been made that the mineralization could be
economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve
determination is made. The SEC's disclosure standards normally do not
permit the inclusion of information concerning "measured mineral
resources", "indicated mineral resources" or "inferred mineral
resources" or other descriptions of the amount of mineralization in
mineral deposits that do not constitute "reserves" by U.S. standards in
documents filed with the SEC. Investors are cautioned not to assume that
any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be
converted into reserves. U.S. investors should also understand that
"inferred mineral resources" have a great amount of uncertainty as to
their existence and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal
feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an "inferred
mineral resource" will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under
Canadian rules, estimated "inferred mineral resources" may not form the
basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies except in rare cases.
Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an
"inferred mineral resource" exists or is economically or legally
mineable. Disclosure of "contained ounces" in a resource is permitted
disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC normally only
permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute
"reserves" by SEC standards as in-place tonnage and grade without
reference to unit measures. The requirements of NI 43-101 for
identification of "reserves" are also not the same as those of the SEC,
and reserves reported by the Company in compliance with NI 43-101 may
not qualify as "reserves" under SEC standards. Accordingly, information
concerning mineral deposits set forth herein may not be comparable with
information made public by companies that report in accordance with U.S.
standards.